Wednesday, June 20, 2018
Tuesday, June 19, 2018
Sapiens
I was a bit disappointed with this.
I was hoping for a more in depth look at our ancestors, particularly during the cognitive revolution.
I did learn that chimps spend 5 hours a day chewing. I found the book more an overview. A useful one, but one that skirted the problems, and issues.
For example, during the discussion about money, and specifically credit. Noah, uses the Spanish monarchy as an example of a state that repels credit in contrast with the Dutch republic. Or he later use the British industrial revolution to expand on the railway
I think he missed things, such as the importance of dairy farming, Europe's division. The break of church and state. The dumb luck of missing the mongol invasion. That said I think the book acts as a good primer-particularly when talking about economics, and the rise of the modern capitalist /scientific state
His critique of capitalism is interesting. I agree that markets can never be totally unregulated so, you accept this and go forward. The analogy with the agricultural revolution ultimately their were too people to go back. I think at some points Noah is too sympathetic to the Hunter gathers,
See
https://quillette.com/2017/12/16/romanticizing-hunter-gatherer/
I was surprised to see such effort spent on thinking about animal conditions., There were two criticisms to be made to this. One the suffering of farm animals, leads to cheap protein. We may be selecting for factory farming, and indeed modern biotech may solve that, or simply wealth. The conversation about the benefits of empires did interest me. The fact that well dressed and pious Dutchmen owned slaves was well made.
As I said a good primer, like Jareds Guns, Germs and steel You have to start some where
I was hoping for a more in depth look at our ancestors, particularly during the cognitive revolution.
I did learn that chimps spend 5 hours a day chewing. I found the book more an overview. A useful one, but one that skirted the problems, and issues.
For example, during the discussion about money, and specifically credit. Noah, uses the Spanish monarchy as an example of a state that repels credit in contrast with the Dutch republic. Or he later use the British industrial revolution to expand on the railway
I think he missed things, such as the importance of dairy farming, Europe's division. The break of church and state. The dumb luck of missing the mongol invasion. That said I think the book acts as a good primer-particularly when talking about economics, and the rise of the modern capitalist /scientific state
His critique of capitalism is interesting. I agree that markets can never be totally unregulated so, you accept this and go forward. The analogy with the agricultural revolution ultimately their were too people to go back. I think at some points Noah is too sympathetic to the Hunter gathers,
See
https://quillette.com/2017/12/16/romanticizing-hunter-gatherer/
I was surprised to see such effort spent on thinking about animal conditions., There were two criticisms to be made to this. One the suffering of farm animals, leads to cheap protein. We may be selecting for factory farming, and indeed modern biotech may solve that, or simply wealth. The conversation about the benefits of empires did interest me. The fact that well dressed and pious Dutchmen owned slaves was well made.
As I said a good primer, like Jareds Guns, Germs and steel You have to start some where
The Falcons of Malta
Its been a while since I read a new AH novel. Its been longer since, I read a WW2 novel. I am simply bored with Nazis. They are everywhere, Every dam villain in cartoons to congressional hearings is a Nazi. Yeah I get it racism is bad. Yes. There is a problem with Nazis as stock villains they always do the same villainy. Someone telegenic gets discriminated against... This leaves nothing new for the viewer what are you going to do that is going to to top Schindlers list or the Pianist There is also very little conflict- because we no the Nazis are not supermen. This was my problem with Khan in the new trek film. Khan was written as a Nazi, rather than as Superman...Bloody DC comics gets it better.
Well the POD is Hitler dies, poisoned by accident after the fall of France.
A Goering / Reynard H coup takes over the Reich. Reynard H, the hangman of Prague, uses the Nazi party to gain power over Europe and win the war. Its a cast of thousands and we see things from Berlin palaces to back street cafes. The story focuses on two teens, who blunder into the action. One a HJ member who gets caught up and promoted and decorated in the chaos that follows. The lad is tall, his voice breaking and clumsy and awkward. He is well observed and well written. There is his Juliet, a Jewish German from Hungary. The two meet when the lad saves Greta from a mob in a border incident
What I like about the book, is that we see the world war as most people lived it. Not bright uniforms, gleaming steel ships, and Moonlight serenade. But people scrambling to survive, where a few pairs of trousers is loot, and a hot meal a big deal. The boy is confused, the girl is told in no certain terms, not to be coy by her parents. They need their German protector
I should explain that one of the plot points is that the Nazis are now better lead, and willing to be more reasonable on the Jewish issue. Basically Reynard will send Europe's Jews south to be the subjects and colonists of the new Italian empire. The Germans bully the Italians into taking their lead, and instead of the battle of Britain we get an invasion of Malta This is after a brief bloody war in Hungary.
The book pulls no punches with the Nazis. The Germans are better let and more cynical. The writer uses Reynard using Orwell's two plus two equals five as a motif to inform the reader when the party line is going to change, or overlook something. But we see Goering having to physically control himself to stop a temper tantrum, despite the fact he wishes to drink and fornicate. Eichmann torturing a Jewish teen, is one of the darkest pieces of writing I have seen outside S.M Stirling. If Stirling writes about the darkness, Palter catches the fog of war, or life. The Edwardian major general at the docks in Malta is one of my favourite scenes
Though I knew the plot, I admired how Palter and Rhode kept up the tension, I knew the ending but neither side had it easy. The British do not sit back, and spend their fury on plot armour
Occasionally some of the writing is jarring. German generals keep saying as if! As if it were 98 and there is a subplot with Oriana I see no point with. Finally the Money penny character while well observed the name gets grating
The last great WW2 AH. The Belisarius of a ruined AH
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Ready Player One
I enjoyed this a lot more than Jame's Gunn Superman which I viewed on Sunday. The two films are full of CGI, Ready Player one is indee...
-
A short story inspired by an idea of a German victory in WW1 Washington 1940. (Somewhere past the horizon) He would let the man speak. A...
-
https://youtu.be/Y4FrnrD7jCA?si=qxHDaa76TgLPV6s_ Rondo Veneziano - La Serenissima 1981, I saw this on ITV years ago on a Sunday - never fo...